🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils will be cut by over 50%, after a divisive law change that required local governments to put the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include one or more councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time generating community backing and pushing their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 decided to keep their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” approaches, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to establish different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation suggested the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that voted to keep their seats.